GPSNR Working Groups Update: January-February 2023

Share This Post

The strategy and objectives working group

Both the subworking groups under the umbrella of the Strategy and Objectives WG are occupied with some critical milestones. The Risk Subgroup would soon be receiving the final draft for the risk assessment framework by ASI, which it will fine-tune based on the feedback received during the meetings in Singapore and online at the end of January. They are also kickstarting the traceability field trials in Indonesia and Thailand, for which they will soon start evaluating proposals, while hosting some members webinars on different traceability tools available in the market.

On the other hand, the Assurance Model taskforce is streamlining the category specific KPIs along with the members journey/assurance model blueprint that was finalised during the latest hybrid meetings. You can find more context in the minutes here or reach out for questions on info@gpsnr.org.

The smallholder representation working group:

Along with the work on the smallholder policy equivalent for which the WG has already sent out an all-member survey and initiating the HCSA-HCVN NR Smallholder Toolkit Field Trials, they are preparing for the decided merger with the capacity building working group. More details on how this will play out can be found here.

The policy toolbox working group:

The group is working on a tender to Crosswalk RR framework with CDP Forest and GRI Reporting, while aligning with the Assurance Model taskforce on the KPI on due diligence.

The capacity building working group:

The group is overseeing the pilot agroforestry project in Thailand that kicked off last December, as well as ongoing GAP coaching and disease fighting projects in Indonesia. The group is also working with the newly appointed consultants at Koltiva for the pilot Knowledge Sharing Platform for smallholders. Along with working with the smallholder representation working group on the merger, they continue their tasks of overseeing existing field projects, seeking members’ funding for projects in Côte d’Ivoire and Indonesia..

The shared responsibility working group:

As per the decisions taken on the next steps during the hybrid meetings in January-February, the group is working with the Tiremaker category on streamlining a proposal on shared investment while also completing the deliverables on the other pillars. They are also aligning with the Assurance Model taskforce on how the KPIs will integrate into the Shared Investment mechanism.

February 23, 2023

More To Explore

Members

Embracing our Shared Responsibility: GPSNR’s newest Working Group (Members Version)

Before the second General Assembly on 23 September 2020, the GPSNR Executive Committee had approved the creation of a Shared Responsibility Working Group that would be tasked to define the principles of shared responsibility for GPSNR.

The term ‘shared responsibility’ is relatively new to the sustainability scene, and as such, there is currently no commonly accepted definition for it. In general, shared responsibility is a value-driven concept which recognizes that supply chains are structurally imbalanced in terms of value and benefit, risk, burden of compliance, climate change impacts, power of negotiation, and access to information and resources. A shared responsibility approach strives for value, benefits, risks and improvement investments to be equitably distributed across all actors within the supply chain.

In order to establish the foundational work that would enable the creation of the Shared Responsibility Working Group, the Executive Committee formed a Task Force comprising several of its members. Over a series of weekly calls, the Task Force has developed a Terms of Reference (ToR) and a set of Guiding Principles to inform the work of the new Shared Responsibility Working Group.

It is envisioned that the Shared Responsibility Working Group will draw from the Guiding Principles for Shared Responsibility (currently being developed by the Executive Committee’s Shared Responsibility Task Force), as well as the GPSNR Equity Definition and the studies launched by the Equity Working Group, to develop an implementation framework for the platform with respect to shared responsibility.

GPSNR is now looking for members interested in joining the Shared Responsibility Working Group, to register with the Secretariat. If you are interested to join the SR WG, please email Aidan (aidan@gpsnr.org) to indicate your interest. The deadline for expressing interest is Wednesday 24th February, after which the WG will nominate co-chairs and kickoff as soon as possible.

The Shared Responsibility Working Group Terms of Reference can be found here.

Shared-Responsibility-WG-TOR Download

GPSNR Staff February 16, 2021

Shared Responsibility in Action: Goodyear and GM Support Smallholder Rubber in Indonesia

Indonesia is the world’s second-largest producer of natural rubber, a material vital to the global tire and automotive supply chain, which consumes more than 70% of global production. However, the country’s smallholder farmers, who produce the majority of this rubber, face mounting challenges, including aging tree stock, limited technical support, and decreasing participation from younger generations.

Figure. 1

To help address these structural issues, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company has supported the Smallholder GAP Coaching Project since its launch in 2022 under the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR). In its third phase (September 2024 to September 2025), Goodyear is joined by General Motors (GM) as a co-funder. As shown in Fig. 1, this phase has exceeded its target, reaching 2,767 smallholders in South Sumatra (target: 2,700).

Coaching the Next Generation

This project established participation targets of at least 40% women and 20% youth. By July 2025, these benchmarks were not only met but exceeded — 1,182 women (109%) and 791 youth (146%) have received coaching.

One of these youth participants is a 24-year-old farmer from South Sumatra who manages a 1.5-hectare rubber plot inherited from her family. Despite challenges, she continues to tap daily and maintain the farm herself. Through the project, a farm assessment revealed previously undiagnosed leaf disease. With targeted support, she learned to identify early symptoms, adopt better tapping practices, and implement yield-improving interventions.

Planting for the Future, Earning in the Present

In Musi Rawas, the project’s sole demonstration plot highlights how regenerative practices can offer both environmental and economic benefits. The 0.25-hectare agroforestry site, managed by 54-year-old Subarni, was converted from a 33-year-old jungle rubber plot into a more productive and diversified system.

With support from the project implementation team, Subarni replanted 120 improved rubber clones and intercropped the land with bananas, peanuts, and durian. The peanuts alone are expected to yield approximately 150 kilograms every four months, beginning in July 2025 — a critical alternate source of income during the long replanting period.

“Normally, you wait years after replanting rubber before seeing any return,” he said. “Now, I see income while waiting too, and that gives me the motivation to keep going.”

Beyond immediate income, long-term investments like durian, a high-value crop locally known for its premium quality, reflect how smallholders are planning beyond subsistence. The demonstration plot now serves as a practical model for neighbouring farmers exploring integrated, sustainable rubber production.

Digital Tools for Real-World Change

Complementing in-person coaching is RubberWiki, a mobile app developed to extend learning beyond the field. As of July 2025, 549 farmers have been successfully onboarded, just over the initial target of 540.

The app offers training modules and real-time rubber price updates, which have proven especially valuable. “I check it almost every day,” said 40-year-old Partini, who uses it to monitor price fluctuations. Others, like 35-year-old Ari, revisit coaching content through the app in the evenings.

By offering flexible, on-demand learning, RubberWiki helps ensure that farmers can continue to build knowledge and confidence well after formal sessions have concluded.

A Model for Shared Industry Commitment

Goodyear has supported the GAP Coaching Project since its earliest days, recognizing that smallholders form the backbone of the global natural rubber value chain. In Phase 3, Goodyear invited General Motors to co-fund the initiative, reflecting a growing movement toward shared accountability across the supply chain.

“Smallholders are the foundation of the natural rubber industry,” said Chuan Heng, Associate Director, GOCPL Natural Rubber, Goodyear. “And, Goodyear, as part of GPSNR, engages in programs that support the natural rubber industry’s move towards a more sustainable supply chain.“

General Motors’ contribution also highlights its broader commitment to responsible sourcing. By funding smallholder-centred programs like this, GM is helping to ensure that sustainability principles are embedded at the very beginning of the rubber lifecycle, where real transformation begins.

Together, Goodyear and GM have shown that when downstream actors work together, the impact is tangible: higher participation from women and youth, expanded access to digital tools, and better agronomic outcomes for thousands of smallholders.

GPSNR Secretariat November 7, 2025